Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
Contact usNews: Electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) from 2025
What is Git and what is the difference between GitHub and GitLab?
01 Relevance
Consume ready-made functionalities
Software as a Service (SaaS) appears both in the form of entire applications, such as the CRM system Salesforce, or as specialized components for selected tasks, such as Google Maps. A good IT solution for a use case will therefore always use ready-made SaaS services instead of developing them itself, provided they fulfill the desired functionality. This also applies to in-house software, which can of course also be offered to customers and internally as Software-as-a-Service. Lower development costs, higher operational stability, better maintainability and a greater wealth of features regularly speak in favor of using SaaS services.
Only pay for what you use
SaaS services are usually billed according to the "pay-as-you-go" method. This means that you only pay for what you use. Some services also offer quantity-based scaling. For most use cases, it is therefore also cheaper to integrate or use ready-made solutions. Only very specific solutions or solutions with a very large volume can be developed more cost-effectively in-house if the SaaS provider does not offer an "enterprise" price list. As a rule, the consumption-based solution is cheaper than reinventing the wheel, especially when creating new solutions.
Interchangeability
02 Success factors
Software-as-a-Service, like cloud services, gives the creator tremendous power and opens up countless possibilities. As there are two sides to every coin, important economic and technical aspects must also be taken into account here, which can be decisive for success:
-
Dependency and lock-in effects
-
Calculability of usage fees
-
Data security and data protection
-
Operational management and traceability
-
Limits of individual SaaS services and their infrastructure
03 Procedure
Fit-gap analysis
Which business requirements are to be solved by the SaaS service? How should it be embedded in the workflow or business transactions in detail? Does the service fulfill all aspects critical to success? What alternatives are there? It all starts with the task definition. Only when it is clear which problems the SaaS service solves and how should it be shortlisted. Because a lot is promised in the abstract, while success lies in the fulfillment of concrete details. Consequently, we scrutinize and test all relevant aspects independently of the vendor's marketing promises.
Quality and consistency
If a SaaS service meets the desired requirements, we put it through its technical paces. We also keep a close eye on the provider behind it: How does it behave in the event of problems? How reliable and uninterrupted is the service? Does the provider change the service so that adjustments are necessary? Only if the overall impression is right do we take the next step and embed the service deeper into the process flow and route higher volumes through it.
Positive skepticism
Software-as-a-Service shares many characteristics with ordinary consumer goods such as electricity or telephony. In principle, they can be replaced more quickly, but must also be embedded in the application architecture. We therefore always maintain a healthy skepticism towards the providers, even if we generally assume positive intentions. Ultimately, it is not us who have to earn the trust of our clients every day, but also our business partners.
What customers say
Text customers